Pressuremeter Test (PMT) Calculator | PMT Test Interpretations

Pressuremeter Test Calculator

Pressuremeter Test (PMT) Calculator

This calculator automatically evaluates:

  • EM/PLN Ratio
  • Soil Nature
  • Soil Condition
  • Density / Consistency
  • Undrained Shear Strength (cu)
  • Oedometric Modulus (M)
  • Estimated SPT-N
EM / PLN Ratio = Menard Modulus / Net Limit Pressure

Calculated Results

EM / PLN Ratio:

Soil Nature:

Auto Detected Soil Condition:

Density / Consistency:

Selected αM Factor:

Oedometric Modulus M: MPa

Undrained Shear Strength cu: kPa

Estimated SPT-N:

Equations Used

M = EM / αM
cu = 0.67 × PLN0.75
EM / PLN > 12 → Cohesive Soil

7 < EM / PLN < 12 → Cohesionless Soil

Automatic Soil Condition Logic

Soil Type Condition EM/PLN Ratio
Clay Overconsolidated >16
Clay Normally Consolidated 9 – 16
Clay Weathered / Remoulded 7 – 9
Silt Overconsolidated >14
Silt Normally Consolidated 8 – 14
Sand Overconsolidated / Dense >12
Sand Normally Consolidated 7 – 12
Sand & Gravel Overconsolidated >10
Sand & Gravel Normally Consolidated 6 – 10

Pressuremeter Test Diagram

Pressuremeter Probe Soil Mass Soil Mass Radial Pressure Radial Pressure
Interpretation Note: Higher EM/PLN ratios indicate:
  • Stiffer soils
  • Dense granular structure
  • Overconsolidated conditions
  • Lower compressibility
Lower EM/PLN ratios indicate:
  • Soft soils
  • Loose structure
  • Higher compressibility
  • Weathered/remoulded conditions
Disclaimer: This calculator is intended for educational and preliminary geotechnical assessment only. Final engineering design should be based on detailed site investigation and professional engineering judgement. This calculator has been developed based on Briaud (1992), Baguelin et al. (1978), and Menard Pressuremeter correlations.

Author

Mohan Dangi (Gold Medalist)

Civil Engineer | Geotechnical Engineer

References

  • Briaud, J.L. (1992) — The Pressuremeter
  • Baguelin et al. (1978) — Pressuremeter and Foundation Engineering
  • Amar et al. (1991) — Pressuremeter Correlations

0 Comments